Comments on: Romney Campaign Launches Negative Ad Against Huckabee, Choice: The Record

By: Julie Marker

Julie Marker — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:03:43 +0000

It is obvious that many Americans do not understand the Amnesty Bill John McCain is supporting!

1. All illegal aliens including all convicted of federal crimes ( except a FEW with a certain type of sex crime) including Bank Robbers, illegal who have committed assaults; those who were previously deported…..would be able to receive a “Z-VISA” that would allow those illegal’s to stay in the USA FOREVER and collect free benefits from taxpayers!

2. They would be protected from deportation forever!

3. John McCain bill did not require any illegal alien’s to apply for citizenship, they could just stay forever use our free benefits; be protected and NEVER even try to be a real citizen; never learn English, never assimilate. IT WAS NOT REQUIRED.

4. Once given a “Z-VISA” illegal alien would have a “special status” that the bill said would make them eligible for all the Welfare (etc.) Benefits that were normally reserved for only US Citizens. So they would be just as uneducated, but able to collect even MORE free Benefits and cost billions more in our tax dollar!

5. Once given a “Z-Visa” their “special status” would allow them to apply for additional visa’s to bring all their poor relatives here too.

NO to John McCain!

YES! to Mitt Romney!

By: Romney Camp Launches Second Attack Ad Against Huckabee « FOX Embeds « FOXNews.com

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:50:50 +0000

[...] Romney Camp Launches Second Attack Ad Against Huckabee by Shushannah Walshe The Romney camp launched a new negative ad against Mike Huckabee set to air today in Iowa. This is the second commercial that the Romney campaign prefers to call a “contrast ad” because t… [...]

By: S Kitchen

S Kitchen — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:02:10 +0000

I watched this Romney ad expecting something bad, and I can’t really figure out why you refer to it as a negative ad. It actually says some positive things about Huckabee before it lists a couple of positions on his record. It doesn’t call him names and doesn’t use those weird “scary” camera angles. It just says what Huckabee’s positions have been. If that’s negative, that’s Huckabee’s fault. Those are his positions without exaggeration.

By: TC

TC — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:06:46 +0000

Why is it “negative” to point out how they differ on policy? Romney didn’t say anything that is not true and proven in Mr. Huckabee’s record. If Mr. Huckabee is defensive about it, then I would say it’s because he wants to hide from his record. As for Mr. McCain, he comes across like an angry, petty, old man. I, for one, am tired of the flip-flop label that everyone tries to pin on Romney. Get over it already! Look at the facts (his record as governor, businessman, and the Olympics) and ignore all the rhetoric. It’s hard to peg someone as disingenuous when he’s been married for 38 years (to the same woman) and has five sons that love and respect him. That fact alone speaks volumes about his character and the kind of leader he’d be.

By: MSKAZ

MSKAZ — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:36:08 +0000

I disagree with the notion that outlining differences in positions on immigration is a negative attack or smear. How are people supposed to pick a canidate without knowing the differances in positions. Huckabee admitted his support for illegal immigrant tuition aid in an interview on Fox. Stop the spin please Fox. A better less spin caption for the article would have been Mitt challanges Huckabee on imigration policy.