Comments on: Mitt 1st in Nev!! 3rd in SC?? http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/ Trail vlogs from campaign Carl and the FNC political unit Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:36:14 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: omegahpla http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7873 omegahpla Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:41:48 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7873 In states where non republicans can't spoil the republian primary vote, McCain will drop like a rock. Those states coming up are such states. You can't keep up a dead horse in a horse race by calling him the leader for too long Carl. In states where the evangelical christian vote is not overwhelming (that's all he's really gotten to date) the Huckster will drop like a rock. Thompson isn't viable at this point. Ron Paul is about as viable as any ankle biter could be, and if he ever came up in the poles his multitude of idiotic, inaccurate, and dishonest statements would bury him in a heart beat. Giuliani is still well known nationally and has a lot of deep rooted support that goes deeper than the latest fad of the hour which most of the candidates have been depending on. Romney is a serious candidate, he beats anyone head to head in debate when given a chance, he has shown himself to be very paletable to even liberal voters (as has Giuliani) and you can tell by the liberal media and democrats reaction that they do fear him the most. Probably even more than they fear Giuliani by the way they act. Romney runs very deep, and he has by far the most cash. I am happy with these trends as I feel most of the US is, or will be when they start paying attention. I like Both Giuliani (who I favor because I think he is the best man to take on democrats and the liberal media's ongoing campaign of disinformation which is hurting this country by planting lies and inaccurate paradigms, in the minds of our people). I also like Romney for his brilliant economic accumin and long record of brilliant accomplishment, and a way of making large entities work efficiently which is what would help us a great deal in this country and make life better for everyone. I dearly wish we could have both in office at one time, that would be absolutely beautiful, the best we have ever had in the office of president in this country. In states where non republicans can’t spoil the republian primary vote, McCain will drop like a rock. Those states coming up are such states. You can’t keep up a dead horse in a horse race by calling him the leader for too long Carl.

In states where the evangelical christian vote is not overwhelming (that’s all he’s really gotten to date) the Huckster will drop like a rock.

Thompson isn’t viable at this point.

Ron Paul is about as viable as any ankle biter could be, and if he ever came up in the poles his multitude of idiotic, inaccurate, and dishonest statements would bury him in a heart beat.

Giuliani is still well known nationally and has a lot of deep rooted support that goes deeper than the latest fad of the hour which most of the candidates have been depending on.

Romney is a serious candidate, he beats anyone head to head in debate when given a chance, he has shown himself to be very paletable to even liberal voters (as has Giuliani) and you can tell by the liberal media and democrats reaction that they do fear him the most. Probably even more than they fear Giuliani by the way they act. Romney runs very deep, and he has by far the most cash.

I am happy with these trends as I feel most of the US is, or will be when they start paying attention. I like Both Giuliani (who I favor because I think he is the best man to take on democrats and the liberal media’s ongoing campaign of disinformation which is hurting this country by planting lies and inaccurate paradigms, in the minds of our people). I also like Romney for his brilliant economic accumin and long record of brilliant accomplishment, and a way of making large entities work efficiently which is what would help us a great deal in this country and make life better for everyone. I dearly wish we could have both in office at one time, that would be absolutely beautiful, the best we have ever had in the office of president in this country.

]]> By: Mrs. Smart http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7766 Mrs. Smart Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:10:25 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7766 What is SC anyhow in terms of voting? When was the last time they got it right? How is it that those voters were more important than Michigan or Nevada? I can't stand the hypocrisy on Fox and CNN!! What is SC anyhow in terms of voting? When was the last time they got it right? How is it that those voters were more important than Michigan or Nevada?

I can’t stand the hypocrisy on Fox and CNN!!

]]> By: robertsc http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7763 robertsc Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:03:27 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7763 Can anyone tell me who came in Second place in Iowa, New Hampshire, Wyoming, Michigan, South Carolina? I assure the elit media has shown that statistic. However who came in SECOND in Nevada? Why is this being ignored? Media, answer the question. No I am not a supporter of Ron Paul, I am a supporter of the U.S Constitution, which you are not! http://abbevillecolos.wordpress.com/ Can anyone tell me who came in Second place in Iowa, New Hampshire, Wyoming, Michigan, South Carolina? I assure the elit media has shown that statistic. However who came in SECOND in Nevada? Why is this being ignored? Media, answer the question. No I am not a supporter of Ron Paul, I am a supporter of the U.S Constitution, which you are not!

http://abbevillecolos.wordpress.com/

]]> By: Concerned http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7742 Concerned Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:23:39 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7742 Gollaher,his releigion doesn't matter to you maybe,to the Christian that honors God first and refuses to lower himself to a group that states that you will be Judged by Joseph Smith,and not Jesus Christ,What the Christian people say is very understandable,in fact it would be something the Christian would have to answer for,when his day to be judged came....but I assure you he wouldn't be answering to Joseph Smith.....As a Bishop in that orgaization,he has to answer to their living prophet,and being president don't put him above the living prophet....If you like Romney you vote for him,but you should also be aware of the facts.....you read words like Bigot and bigotry when in fact people are standing for what the Bible contains,not what has been added to it Gollaher,his releigion doesn’t matter to you maybe,to the Christian that honors God first and refuses to lower himself to a group that states that you will be Judged by Joseph Smith,and not Jesus Christ,What the Christian people say is very understandable,in fact it would be something the Christian would have to answer for,when his day to be judged came….but I assure you he wouldn’t be answering to Joseph Smith…..As a Bishop in that orgaization,he has to answer to their living prophet,and being president don’t put him above the living prophet….If you like Romney you vote for him,but you should also be aware of the facts…..you read words like Bigot and bigotry when in fact people are standing for what the Bible contains,not what has been added to it

]]> By: nathan http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7614 nathan Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:38:37 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7614 Fact Henry is a pin head! He knows nothing about mormons. This is anti mormon bigotry that has been spread around for almost two hundred years, people like henry make the mormon convert rate increase! so Keep it up! Fact the state of nevada is only 7-8 % mormon. Romney would have won even if there were no mormons in the state. Fact Henry is a pin head! He knows nothing about mormons. This is anti mormon bigotry that has been spread around for almost two hundred years, people like henry make the mormon convert rate increase! so Keep it up! Fact the state of nevada is only 7-8 % mormon. Romney would have won even if there were no mormons in the state.

]]> By: Ron Brown http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7586 Ron Brown Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:28:45 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7586 So, why is 3rd a victory for Romney and not for Thompson? Thompson is the only conservative and the only one for whom I will vote. So, why is 3rd a victory for Romney and not for Thompson? Thompson is the only conservative and the only one for whom I will vote.

]]> By: omegahpla http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7521 omegahpla Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:54:06 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7521 Yemisi ... Correction here. The mormon thing in NV was drilled add nausium, and it was not warranted. Only 9% of nevadans are mormons, and Romney would have won by a huge margine even if no mormons even voted in Nevada. At least Fox never said Romney won because of mormons as some ignorant idiots on other networks did. All in all though Romney is treated by Fox like a baby treats a diaper. He is without a doubt the front runner in everything but some arbitrary favoritism of some states and some voters, and some deligates over others though as far as I know they all count the same. The way this stuff is covered in nonsensical in the extreme. If they ever compared deligates for deligates and or placement in each race in a quantitative non prejudicial way Romney is way out ahead of the pack. AND Thompson is a good guy, maybe he didn't run the best race, but he told the truth about Huckabee, and even held back on some ethics problems the Huckster has had in Arkansas that no one is talking about yet, but the democrats surely would in a general election. Huckabee would be easy meat for any democrat running (which is why he is such a liberal media favorite, they totally made him with possitive press attention he got for free) most of us have no idea about the whole story there, yet. Yemisi … Correction here. The mormon thing in NV was drilled add nausium, and it was not warranted. Only 9% of nevadans are mormons, and Romney would have won by a huge margine even if no mormons even voted in Nevada. At least Fox never said Romney won because of mormons as some ignorant idiots on other networks did.

All in all though Romney is treated by Fox like a baby treats a diaper. He is without a doubt the front runner in everything but some arbitrary favoritism of some states and some voters, and some deligates over others though as far as I know they all count the same. The way this stuff is covered in nonsensical in the extreme. If they ever compared deligates for deligates and or placement in each race in a quantitative non prejudicial way Romney is way out ahead of the pack.

AND Thompson is a good guy, maybe he didn’t run the best race, but he told the truth about Huckabee, and even held back on some ethics problems the Huckster has had in Arkansas that no one is talking about yet, but the democrats surely would in a general election. Huckabee would be easy meat for any democrat running (which is why he is such a liberal media favorite, they totally made him with possitive press attention he got for free) most of us have no idea about the whole story there, yet.

]]> By: Bev http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7495 Bev Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:02:44 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7495 Also, you are and have been for a long time very biased against Fred Thompson. For about 30 seconds he and Romney were tied for 3rdplace, and then Fred Thompson steadily gained growed and endedup in third place. Do you recognize that? No, instead you preach defeat. You are slanted and biased, and it is very obvious to me when I see your clips in the words and phrased you choose. I don't see the "Fair and Balanced" in it, and you and the entire Fox Campaign team should be called to task for it. It is obvious to anyone that you all are trying to sway and influence this election. Also, you are and have been for a long time very biased against Fred Thompson. For about 30 seconds he and Romney were tied for 3rdplace, and then Fred Thompson steadily gained growed and endedup in third place. Do you recognize that? No, instead you preach defeat. You are slanted and biased, and it is very obvious to me when I see your clips in the words and phrased you choose. I don’t see the “Fair and Balanced” in it, and you and the entire Fox Campaign team should be called to task for it. It is obvious to anyone that you all are trying to sway and influence this election.

]]> By: Fair and Ballanced http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7488 Fair and Ballanced Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:30:23 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7488 GWASHINGTON1776, They would rather tell you that Mitt won Nevada amoung mormons than MITT LEADS McCAIN AMOUNG REPUBLICAN VOTES NATIONWIDE. GWASHINGTON1776,

They would rather tell you that Mitt won Nevada amoung mormons than MITT LEADS McCAIN AMOUNG REPUBLICAN VOTES NATIONWIDE.

]]> By: annette http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7452 annette Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:49 +0000 http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/19/mitt-1st-in-nev-3rd-in-sc/#comment-7452 Shane, you are correct. Shane, you are correct.

]]>