Comments on: McCain to speak to Council for National Policy Friday

By: Red

Red — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:45:58 +0000

I ha*e NI*G*Rs
I ha*e NI*G*Rs
I ha*e NI*G*Rs
I ha*e NI*G*Rs
I ha*e NI*G*Rs
I ha*e NI*G*Rs
I ha*e NI*G*Rs
I ha*e NI*G*Rs

Sean Hannity and Hal Turner know how to hate NI*G*Rs. I watch him every night. Sometimes he brings a NI*G*R on his show and rips that blacky a new backside. When will those darkies learn that they will NEVER get anywhere as long as real WHITE Americans are still living here?

By: mqelbkd

mqelbkd — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:00:39 +0000

cool site for my mind its very goodPlease, send your abuse here!!! send.your.abuse.here@gmail.com

By: Jeff

Jeff — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:14:01 +0000

A Canadian feeling sorry for America??!!..LOLOL

Canada is like being the little brother to the biggest, toughest kid in school. As long as big brother is around, you’ll never have to worry or actually do anything.
As far as politics, you have a province holding you hostage for years, threating to secede from Canada, unless you do the dual language thing and kiss…well you know.

Worry about your own country.

By: Pamela

Pamela — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:51:41 +0000

*Middle east money Clinton’s donations by Arabs and Chinese

Google these words then click on web page then watch video-SHOCKING!!!

By: Ted Canada

Ted Canada — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:37:43 +0000

I am sure you may not want to hear this from a white catholic Canadian 50 plus north of the border.
I am neither a republican nor democrat and American party politics is at best boring and predictable.
So do what is right for the American people – yes the people! Not the Party
I have long respected and felt sorry for my southern neighbors and the deplorable image they have across the world. I think it is unjust!
But this time around, if you vote in McCain or Clinton and don’t understand how you have an opportunity to change the world’s perception of the American people!
Then people like me will stop feeling sorry for you. You will be the “author of you own misery”. Do something right and don’t put politics, party, race, religion and gender before the people!
The world is watching and it is your call! I am tired of feeling sorry for you. From the outside you look like a MESS!!

By: angela pink

angela pink — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:52:51 +0000

Senator Obama is a hypocrite and liar! If all supper delegates have to follow the voice of they voters then Hilary should get Obama’s pledged supper delegates. McCain as old as his republican party and it worries me. Since Obama shown his real color and inexperience, Hilary is only one left standing and she gets my vote.

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:09:48 +0000

State Senator,Rev. James T. Meeks (D-IL) is a super delegate pledged to presidential candidate Barack Obama. It has been said that Meeks is an advisor and confidant of Obama. He has also been known to render controversial sermons in the pulpit of his Chicago based church-Salem Baptist. The video below reflects one of his sermons and its message sounds earily familiar.

If you have trouble viewing this video, click here.

Meeks has also been identified as receiving $20,000 in campaign donations from Antoin “Tony” Rezko of Chicago. Obama has recently come under fire for accepting large campaign contributions from Rezko who started receiving tax dollars to build housing for the poor after donating major amounts of money to particular political campaigns. Rezko is currently on trial for corruption charges.

Is it just me or is the Obama campaign starting to sound like a broken record?

HEY OBAMA- THIS IS YOUR SUPER DELEGATE- LOL

By: Stephen

Stephen — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +0000

Barrack says his judgement on the war was better, but based upon what?
So just what information did he base his opinion upon?
After all he did not have the actual intelligence reports.
Maybe his opinion on not going to war was based on a breifing from Rev. Wright.

Jerry quotes CNN:
Only 36 percent of those polled said the situation in Iraq was worth going to war over — down from 68 percent in March 2003, when the war began.

68% said it was worth it when the war began.
Why did Obama have a different opinion? Based upon what?

By: Jerry

Jerry — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:10:25 +0000

CNN) — More than 7 out of 10 Americans think government spending on the war in Iraq is partly responsible for the economic troubles in the United States, according to results of a recent poll.

In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll conducted last weekend, 71 percent said they think U.S. spending in Iraq is a reason for the nation’s poor economy. Twenty-eight percent said they didn’t think so.

The weekend poll, timed to coincide with the Iraq war’s fifth anniversary, also showed little U.S. support for the conflict. Fewer than one in three respondents — 32 percent — said they support the war, while 66 percent said they oppose it.

Sixty-one percent of those polled said the next president should remove most U.S. troops from Iraq “within a few months of taking office.”

Only 36 percent of those polled said the situation in Iraq was worth going to war over — down from 68 percent in March 2003, when the war began.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:24:59 +0000

Barrack says his judgement on the war was better, but based upon what?

McCain and Clinton both had breifings and the NIE report (which Clinton admits that she did not read).
Barrack was not in the senate at the time, and received no breifings of any kind.

So just what information did he base his opinion upon?
Was it just a lucky guess?
After all he did not have the actual intelligence reports.

Maybe his opinion on not going to war was based on a breifing from Rev. Wright.